English_Ogles 004

THE OGLES OF OGLE AND BOTHAL
To which are added some accounts of the families who eventually succeeded to the property, see pedigree I

Page 25

I.—. . . De Ogle tempore Willelmi Conquestoris,’ as Dodsworth has it in his pedigree, or tempora Guilielmi Conquestoris’ in his introduction, of the family, representing him as the figure of a man, holding in his right arm a shield, and his left extended to his line of descendants¹. He has been named Robert and also Gilbert, but with no authority whatever.² By a comparison between the pedigrees of the Ogles and the Bertrams, he appears to have been of the same generation as Sir Richard Bertram, who dates from the Norman Conquest. It has been said that ‘Humphrey Ogle esquire, lived at Ogle castle at the Conquest, to whom William the Conqueror by his deed without date, confirmed to him, all his Liberties and Royalties of his manor and estate of Ogle, in as ample a manner as any of his ancestors enjoyed the same before the coming of the Normans,’ and these words were actually inscribed on the walls of Bothal church³, but they are not the original words and a mistake has been made⁴; it is quite possible that there may have been two Ogles named Humphrey, and that this was one of them, and it is clear that he was the father of a Humphrey Ogle who, to judge from his charter, held by inheritance.⁵ He was probably born not later than the year 1055⁶ in which year Siward, earl of Northuinbria, died and Tosti became earl in his room. The latter having been expelled went abroad, and returning with Hardrada, king of Norway, invaded Yorkshire, but was defeated by Morkar, his successor, in the earldom, and Edwin, earl of Mercia. In 1066 after the battle of Hastings, Morkar joined Malcolm, king of Scotland, with other Englishmen and Danes disaffected towards the Conqueror, having in the meantime constituted Osulf, the son of Eadulf, earl of the present county, in his place. In 1068 the Conqueror defeated Edgar Atheling and Malcolm, king of Scotland, at Gateshead Fell, and constituted Copsi, earl in Osulf’s room. Gospatrick and Robert Comyn followed as earls of Northumberland, and after the death of the latter at Durham, William in 1069 invaded that county, upon which it is related the monks fled to Lindisfarne with the body of St. Cuthbert: at this time Gospatrick was again earl but disliking the Conqueror’s severe proceedings fled with Edgar Atheling and Malcolm, who in 1071 roused the North against William, who passed through Northumberland the next year on his way to the Tay where Malcolm agreed to do homage for his lands held in England. In the same year Waltheof became earl, but being discovered in a conspiracy, was beheaded at Winchester. He was followed by Walcher, bishop of Durham, who was burnt to death in a fire at Gateshead. In 1080 Robert Curthose, son of the Conqueror, on returning from an expedition against the Scots, erected a small New-castle. It is conjectured that about this time,..this Ogle’s son, Humphrey, was born, and the baronies of Alnwick, Morpeth, Mitford, Bolam, and probably Whalton, were formed.

¹ Doclsworth MS. 18 f. I b. ² MS. of 1706 Eg. D. Extracts from Ilopkinson’s MS. Collections
from Hodgson’s MSS. ³ Arch. Ael. XIX, p. 251. ⁴See p. 19. ⁵Ap. 3. ⁶ See p. 26.

Page 26

In 1088 Geoffrey, bishop of Coutance, seems to have become earl of Northumberland, but soon after Robert, son of Roger Mowbray, was earl of the county. In 1093 King Malcolm again invaded the county and besieged Alnwick, but Earl Mowbray assisted by Morrel of Bamburgh, the steward and sheriff, defeated and killed Malcolm and his son, who were afterwards buried at Tynmouth⁷. In 1095 Mowbray being in a conspiracy against William Rufus was by that king beseiged in Bamburgh castle. Mowbray having fled to Tynmouth, Morrell surrendered the castle. For some years after this, no earl is mentioned in history, and this Ogle having lived through these turbulent times, probably died in the reign of Henry I (To [Henry] II) [1100-1135]

II - Humphrey de Hoggel, or Ogle, was probably born in or before the year 1085⁸. He is described by Dodsworth as a very distinguished man who lived and flourished about the time of William the Conqueror⁹, and he appears to have been a contemporary of William Bertram first baron of Mitford, for Gilbert his son, and Richard Bertram first baron of Bothal, in 1165-6 were contemporaneous as also were Sir Thomas Ogle, his great grandson, and Richard Bertram third baron of Bothal in 1236. In his early days the baron of Balliol (or Bywell) was formed by William Rufus, and at a later date the baronies of Bothal and others by Henry 1., in whose reign he had a Charter from Walter fitz William, baron of Whalton, granting him permission to make his own mill and hold all the cultivation of his own land, in fee and inheritance, etc., together with his remaining fee, the Lady Isabel, the barons wife approving ann attesting¹⁰. The date of this charter is shown above. (see p. 20) to be not later than the year 1125. The original pedigree inscribed on the walls of Botlial church asserts that Walter fitz William came into England with William the Conqueror, who gave him the barony of Whalton, and the said Walter, by his deed without date, granted to Humfrey de Ogle aforesaid all such lands and liberties, as he or any of his predecessors had before the coming of the Normans into England¹¹. If this is correct then this fitz William is the one shown in the roll of Battle Abbey, and there must have been two with the same Christian name, for a Walter fitz William’s name occurs in the Pipe Rolls up to the year 1181, in which year he probably died, and it is hardly possible for there to have been on one of this name from the Conquest up to this time. Mills anciently belonged to the lords of the manor, and when barons built mills the inhabitants of the manor were obliged to take their grain to be ground at the mill for which they paid a fee¹². It thus seems that Humphrey was or had been the lord of a manor, and, as his remaining fee is mentioned, he must have held more than the manor of Ogle. In 1236, Thomas Ogle held Ogle and half of Burradon¹³, during his father Richard’s lifetime who held a lease in Riplington and probably land of his own. It thus seems probable that Humphrey's remaining fee, was in Whalton, Riplington, or Burradon as it is known that the manor of Ogle on one side extended as far as Belsay, and his grandson, Gilbert, held land in Burradon; the grant shows also that Humphrey held by inheritance as well as in fee. He was living on the accession of Stephen and when David I., king of Scotland, occupied Carlisle and Newcastle and the barons pledged themselves to support him: David was proceeding to Durham when he heard Stephen was there and a collision was avoided by his agreeing to abandon the cause of his niece Matilda (the right heir to the crown on condition of his having the earidom of Huntingdon conferred upon him. David claimed the earhdom of Northumberland in right of his wife, a daughter of Earl Waltheof and on Stephen’s refusal to grant it, he, in April, 1137, laid waste Northumberland, but on approaching Newcastle found a large force opposed to

⁷Tate I., p. 46. ⁸See pp. 20, 21. ⁹Ap. 1. ¹⁰Ap. 3. Dug. Bar. I, p. 570. ¹¹Ap. 155. ¹²Tate I., p. 143. ¹³Ap. 21.

Page 27

him,whereupou a truce was concluded, but getting no satisfaction, David besieged Wark and overran the country as far as the Tyne, and fixed himself at Corbridge. On the approach of Stephen he returned to his own country, Stephen making an inroad into Scotland. After Easter in 1138 David invaded the sea coast of the county, captured Norham, then advanced to Bamburgh and Mitford, crossed the Tyne and ravaged as far as the Tees, but on the 22nd of September, 1138, he was defeated at the battle of the Standard. On his way back, however, he, on the 11th of November, took Wark castle. There was a treaty made on the 9th of April, 1139, when Henry, David’s son, received the earldom. How far Humphrey Ogle was connected with these turbulent times history does not relate, but not. many years after he, about 1145, and Gilbert, his son, witnessed certain letters¹⁴, of the ‘ highest lord Walter fitz Willia.m ‘ which certified the issue of a duel at Whalton between William Tascha and Bertram Widdrington and the judgment of Odonell Umfreville thereupon¹⁵. In these duels the special interference of heaven was expected to give the victory to him who fought on the side of justice. A similar duel was fought and won by Robert Bertram of Bothal. Many consider the duel a Norman institution but Worsaae¹⁶ says that the duel called Holmgang was carried by the Normans with them into Normandy and there can scarcely be a doubt, that the Danes and Normans, long before the Conquest of England, long before Canute the Great’s time, introduced it into the Danelag in the North of England, where at least, the word Holmgang in the pure Scandinavian meaning was in use for many generations. That Anglo-Saxon names appear in the above letters or Charter would tend to confirm Worsaae’s opinion. The manor of Widdrington in the time of King Stephen or Henry II was holden of Walter fitz William as of his barony of Whalton¹⁷. Humphrey de Ulgel (sic) was a witness to Walter fitz William’s grant of Gosford to Otwer de Lisle¹⁸. He was evidently dead in 1166.¹⁹ (To III.)

III - Gilbert de Hoggal or Ogle, etc., occurs about 1145 as son of Humphrey Ogle in the list of witnesses who signed the document of the final issue of the trial by duel between William Tascha and Bertram Widdrington²⁰. In 1153, David I., king of Scotland, summoned the barons of Northumberland to do homage to the infant successor of his son Earl Henry, who died that year, and whose eldest son, Malcolm, was heir to the crown and William, Earl David Died the same year as Stephen, in 1154, and Malcolm resigning Cumberland to Henry II., did not assist his brother William’s claims to Northumberland. Gilbert Ogle held half a knight’s fee of land under Walter fitz William, baron of Whalton²¹, who certified his knights fees at the same time as Richard Bertram baron of Bothal. His name occurs in the Pipe Rolls in the years 1169 and 1170,²² and he was a witness to Walter fitz William’s grant of Gosford to Robert de Lisle;²³ in this deed his name appears fourth, in a long list of witnesses, so he must have been of some age, and as his name does not occur in the Pipe Rolls after 1170, and is replaced by Robert Ogle in 1181, it seems that died must have died before the later date. A pedigree quoted by Collins²⁴ calls him William, now William, in Latin, is sometimes written Guilielmus²⁵, and if in the contracted form and badly written would look very much like Gilbertus, especially when the spelling of that time is also considered, and that the French eouivalent Guillaume is also similar. This seems to be the reason for the appearance of the name William. (To IV.)

Robert Ogle occurs as son of Humphrey Ogle²⁶, but there is no proof of his having existed.

¹⁴See below. ¹⁵An. 4. ¹⁶Worsaae, p. 160. ¹⁷Hodgson II., ii., p. 233 ¹⁸Ap. 124. ¹⁹Ap. 5. ²⁰Ap. 4. ²¹Ap. 5. ²²Ap. 275. ²³Ap. 121 ²⁴CAV & Ogle, p. 344. ²⁵See p. 25. ²⁶Harl. MS. 1554f., 132 b.

Page 28

IV - Robert de Oggil or Ogle occurs in the Pipe Rolls in 1181,²⁷ and also as grandson of Humphrey²⁸. ‘In his Majesties Rolles of the Pipe Office it is recorded in the 27^th year of King Henry the second, and that amongst them of Northumberland; that Robert de Ogle was to bringe fower [Note 1 Ed] pledges, to be bound to the king, that he should continue his true and loyall subject, for defence of his castel of Ogle against the Scotts²⁹.   This Robert, called Sir Robert, captured the baron of Rutherford³⁰, although Collins makes out that it was his son who captured both this baron and Alexander Ramsay in battle at Hexham³¹.   This battle of Hexham probably occurred during the inroad of William the Lion, who was seeking restitution of the earldom of Northumberland, and who, in 1173, laid seige to Wark, destroyed Warkworth, advanced upon Newcastle, but passing by beseiged Prudhoe, and subsequently Carlisle³², most likely passing Hexham; however the date is given 1172, when £20 was paid to Odonel de Umfreville to support the soldiers of the castle of Prudhoe on account of losses to the Scots³³.   In 1174, William attacked Wark, Bamburgh. and, not being able to reduce Wark, marched upon Carlisle, and then beseiged Prudhoe again, but being repulsed by Odonel, marched to Alnwick where he was taken prisoner and afterwards surrendered Berwick. In 1175 the Scots sacked Harbottle castle. (To V.)

Gilbert de Hoggill, Oghell, etc., or Ogle, called William for the same reason as shown under Gilbert above, as son of one of the same name, and dying without issue was succeeded by his brother John³⁴. In the accounts of Roger Stuteville, then sheriff, Gilbert de Hoggell is fined one mark for bringing a writ against his lord in 33rd reign of Henry II.³⁵ Hodgson states that he witnessed a deed respecting Milburne in the parish of Ponteland between the years 1184 and 1189. About the year 1190 he is mentioned in connection with the monastery of Tynemouth³⁶, but Gibson, quoting from the same source, says that between 1209 and 1216 Gilbert de Hoghill witnessed a charter of Ralph, prior of Tynemouth. He was evidently dead in 1221, when Agnes is called his late wife and has a difference with Roger de Oghell concerning land in Burradon, which her husband had acquired from Constance de Crammavile and also from her heir Robert de Cramrnaville.*

[M1159] He married Agnes who as late wife in the fifth year of Henry the third had a ‘precipe’ against Roger de Oghell concerning 8 acres of land in Burradon. In 1222 she is stated to owe half a mark for having ‘a pone’ [Note 2] against Reginald de Hoghill concerning land in Burradon.

Sir John de Ogghill, or Ogle, who Collins states succeeded his brother [Gilbert]who had died without issue³⁹.   The name is also noted in Harleian MS No 1554. Sir John and Richard de Oggill occur about 1230-1240, as witnesses with John Morrell of Middleton and others to a deed of Thomas of kenton giving to Thomas, son of Sir John of Belshow, all his share, viz, one sixth part, in the mill of Middleton Morrell ⁴⁰.

Richard de Oggill, or Ogle, occurs about 1230-1240 with Sir John de Oggill as a witness as above⁴¹, and was dead in 40 Henry III., [1256] when Roger his son complains against William de Madle concerning land in Riplington⁴² which William’s cousin Simon had leased for 29 years to Richard de Oggill, who died in 1252.⁴³ This Richard probably held lands in Riplington or Whalton for he never seems to have held Ogle, for his son Thomas, in 20 Henry III., [1236] held Ogle and half Burradon⁴⁴. The one doubtful point is whether he was a son or a brother of John, whose signature stands before his

²⁷Ap 275. ²⁸ Harl. MS. 1554 f. 132 b. Cav. & Ogle, p. 344. ²⁹Ap. 156. ³⁰Ap. 162. ³¹Cav. & Ogle, p. 344. ³²Hodgson I., p. ‘216. ³³Hodgson II., ii., p. 431. ³⁴Car. & Ogle, p. 344. ³⁵Ap. 121. ³⁶Brand II.. p. 78. ³⁷Ap. 18. ³⁸Ap. 275. ³⁹Cav. & Ogle. p. 344 ⁴⁰Ap. 127. ⁴¹Ap. 127. ⁴²See Ap. 21. ⁴³Ap. 288.   ⁴⁴Ap. 21. * Arc. Ael. XXIV., P. 115.

Note 1: Meaning four or four times - from "A concise Anglo-Saxon Dictionary, 4th edition", may be spelled feower also.
Note 2: A pone was a writ issued from the chancery transferring an action entered in the county court or some other local court to one of the courts at Westminster. From "The publications of the Selden Society".

Page 29

as a witness and so was probably younger. It is known that Richard lies in the line of direct descent from Humphrey of the original charter, as the charter passed through the line of Richard’s son Thomas, who was a contemporary or nearly so of Richard Bertram, third baron of Bothal, in 1236,⁴⁵ and his name occurs in the Pipe Rolls in 1219. This fact prevents the insertion of another generation, besides Agnes, late wife of Gilbert, had in 1221 1222 a case against Richard’s son Roger concerning lands in Burradon⁴⁶, who no doubt inherited these lands from his uncle, and the case was a question of dower: thus it seems Richard must have been brother to John; it is not unlikely, moreover, that the Reginald mentioned in the Pipe Rolls, 1222, is not this Richard. (To V. B.)

V - Robert de Oggil is mentioned by Collins as son of Robert and dying in the lifetime of his father, 6 Richard I., [1195] and is probably the same person as shown in Harleian MS. No. 1554, as dying in his father’s lifetime although the dates conflict⁴⁷. There is no proof of his having existed, but, even if he did, his father’s estates passed to his cousin.

B. - Sir Thomas de Oggil, D’Oggil, etc., occurs in the Pipe Rolls in 1219, 1221) and 1221, in which latter year also Roger de Hoggill paid half a mark for summoning him⁴⁸. He and his brother Roger occur as witnesses to a grant by Henry, son of Ralph de Stikelaw, to Richard. son of Geoffrey de Newsham, of land in Stikelaw⁴⁹. Roger Bertram and he witnessed certain grants to Stannington church⁵⁰, also to Roger Merley the third’s grants of Plessy, Shotton, and Blagdon to John de Plessy⁵¹, and to Merley’s grants in Stannington. and Plessey to Sir John de Plessey, also in 1236, Sir Roger Bertram and he witness the grants of Richard Bertram of Bothal to the monastery of Tynmouth concerning the tithes of Bothal⁵², also at Morpeth, etc.⁵³, and these two occur together so often that it appears that Thomas Oggil must have been a justice itinerant as well as Sir Roger Bertram. Thomas was also during the sheriffalty of Hugh de Bolbeck from 1236 to 1245 a witness to a deed respecting the mills of Plessey and to another deed of Roger de Merley⁵⁴. King Henry III. gave him and Roger Mauduit respite concerning the bearing of arms until the feast of Saint Hillary in the 25th year of his reign⁵⁵ [1241]. As Sir Thomas Oggil he witnessed Sir Walter Corbeth’s grant of Colwell, and in 1260 a grant to the convent of Hexham; he thus appears to have been a most active man. In 20 Henry III. [1236], he held Ogle and half of Burradon and later is returned as holding those lands of the heir of John fitz Robert by one and a half knight’s fees⁵⁶. In 1249, he and three other knights were ordered to interview Sir Walran de Horton, and in the same year the sheriff had orders to arrest Sir Thomas and the other knights and to have their bodies at the Strand in Middlesex because they did not appear on a trial of John Baard and Walran de Horton to report upon their view whether the defendant was sick in bed as he pretended and therefore unable to be present at the trial⁵⁷. In 1250, he is fined two marks and Alexander Oggil half a mark for non appearance. His name occurs in the assize roll 40 Henry III.⁵⁹ [1256] In 1259, he and Alexander Oggill are fined the same sums as before⁶⁰. In 1260, he appears at Hexham⁶¹, and in 1263, he made an agreement at Whalton to make reasonable boundaries between Belsay and Ogle⁶², and he occurs last as a witness in 55 Henry III.⁶³ [1271] when he must have been upwards of seventy years of age. The principal events of his period were the revolt of the baronage against King John in 1215 and their homage

⁴⁵Ap. 20. ⁴⁶Ap. 18. ⁴⁷Ap. 162. ⁴⁸Ap. 275. ⁴⁹Ap. 291. ⁵⁰Wallis II., p. 284. ⁵¹Ap. 24. ⁵²Ap. 20. ⁵³Hodgson II. ii., pp. 342-3, 482; Hist. MSS. VI. ⁵⁴Ap. 24. ⁵⁵Ap. 22. ⁵⁶Ap. 21 and 21*. ⁵⁷Hodgson II., ii., p. 259: III., ii.. p. 342. ⁵⁸Ap. 275. ⁵⁹Surt. Soc. 88, P. 64. ⁶⁰Ap. 275. ⁶¹Hist. North. IV., p. 305. ⁶²Ap. 25. ⁶³Wallis II., p. 503.

Page 30

to Alexander II, and John’s burning of Wark, Ainwick, Mitford and Morpeth and the Crusades under Richard I In 1249, Northumberland was formally and legally united to the British Crown. In 1263-65 the barons revolted against King Henry III

He married, it is presumed, the daughter and heir of . . . . Tyson, seeing that the arms of Tyson appear sometimes as quarterings. (To VI now senior line.)

Roger de Hoggill, or Ogle, is fined half a mark in 1221, for summoning Thomas de Hogghill⁶⁴ and the same year Agnes, wife of Gilbert de Oghill, has a case against him concerning 8 acres of land in Burradon⁶⁵, and in 1222 he paid half a mark into the treasury⁶⁶. Thomas and his brother Roger Oggille are witnesses in the thirteenth century to a grant of Henry, son of Ralph de Stikelaw, to Richard, son of Geoffrey de Newsham, of land in Stikelaw⁶⁷. In 40 Henry III [1256] he summoned William de Madle concerning a lease of lands in Riplington which his father Richard had leased from Simon fitz William, cousin of the said William, who had intruded after Richard Oggel's death in 1252.⁶⁸

Gilbert de Oggill, or Ogle, was in about 1249 a witness to a grant for building a stone bridge over the Tyne for which indulgences were given by Siwald, archbishop of York⁶⁹. In 1252, Earl Patrick, Gilbert de Oggele and others are called upon to answer for debts to Matin de Baillol and Ada de Baillol⁷⁰. In the 40th [1256] and 55th [1271] years of the reign of Henry III his name occurs in the assize roll, Northumberland⁷¹; he is mentioned also 2 Edward I [1274] as having been with Sir John Ogle on the inquisition taken at Stannington, 51 Henry III [1267], after the death of the celebrated patriot Simon de Montfort, earl of Leicester, who was killed at Evesham⁷². In 1269, he was a conservator for the Tyne concerning fishing and other matters⁷³. In 55 Henry III [1271] he and Roger de Merley witnessed a deed of Roger de Merley, and again, with Hugh de Bolbec, a grant by the same person⁷⁴. In 1271/2 he was juror on the inquisition of Hugh de Balliol who died seized of Bywell, Ovington, Woodhorn, Newbiggin, Seaton, Hirst, etc.⁷⁵ (To VI M.)

VI - Alexander de Oggill, or Ogle, was named no doubt after Alexander II, king of Scotland, to whom the northern barons did homage in 1215; he occurs in the Pipe Rolls in 1250 as fined half a mark for non appearance, Thomas Oggil being at the same time fined two marks for the same reason. In 1259, the same two are fined again as before, Alexander's name recurs also 1261 and 1269⁷⁶.

Sir John de Oggill was leagued with the rebel barons against Henry III and so was probably at the siege of Northampton and the battles of Lewes and Evesham, and, according to an escheat of 49 Henry III [1149] his lands were "extended" (?)⁷⁷ he, however, soon recovered his estates, which, whilst his father was alive, could not have been great, and moreover he and Gilbert de Oggill were, 51 Henry III [1151], jurors upon an inquest taken at Stannington, respecting lands forfeited in this county by the celebrated Simon de Montfort, earl of Leicester, the leader in the revolt⁷⁸, and he was then a knight, as also in the same king’s reign, when he, Sir John Widdrington, and Sir Hugh Gubium witnessed a charter at Eilington⁷⁹, and he also appears as a witness in 1272 concerning Whittonstal. He with Sir Robert Bertram anti Sir Hugh Gubium witnessed together in 1281,⁸⁰ and he witnessed a deed of Adam de Bolteby, lord of Langley, granting to Sir Thomas de Lucy with Isabel his

⁶⁴Ap. 2 ⁶⁵Ap. 18. ⁶⁶Ap. 275. ⁶⁷Ap. 291. ⁶⁸Ap. 288. ⁶⁹Wallis II , p. 237. ⁷⁰Cal. Scot. ⁷¹Surt. Soc. 88 pp. 22, 52. ⁷²Ap. 139. ⁷³Cal. Scot. ⁷⁴Hodgson III, ii, pp. 65, 67 ⁷⁵Cal. Scot. ⁷⁶Ap. 275. ⁷⁷Cox, p. 679, and Dugdale. ⁷⁷Cav. & Ogle, p. 345. ⁷⁸Ap. 139. ⁷⁹Ap. 250. ⁸⁰Hist. MSS., VI

Page 31

daughter in marriage annuities out of Warden, Fourstones and other places. His name occurs in a deed whereby Adam, son and heir of Gilbert de Stokesfield, quit-claims to Alexander Baihol land in Bywell⁸², and in a numerous number of deeds his name appears⁸³. Sir Robert Bertram and he were Justices in a case for the Prior at Tynemouth⁸⁴; and in 1295/6 as John, son of Thomas de Oggill, he gave to Robert de Oggill, his son, a carucate of land in his demesne of Oggill⁸⁵; two years later he was knight of the shire for Northumberland and served in Parliament. He was at Morpeth a year or two afterwards, and witnessed, with William de Denum, a grant by Roger Craw of Longstratton, Norfolk, to William, son of Roger Bokenfield, of a rent of twenty shillings out of Shotton and Plessey. By a deed dated at Oggehill, 29th December, 1305, he gave to Robert his son and heir all the land of Northstrother in his field of Oggehill, to which deed Sir Hugh Gubium and Roger Gubium were witnesses⁸⁷. Sir Hugh Gubium with Sir Robert Bertram also witnessed his gift of Newham to his daughter Isabel⁸⁸. In 1300 at Oggell, on the Thursday next after the feast of Exaltation of the Holy Cross, he granted to William son of William de Denum lands in Oggell⁸⁹, and three years later gave his son Robert six acres of land in Oghill⁹⁰, and in 1316 all his meddow in Ogill called Milnefordhaugh to William de Denum⁹¹. A black letter MS. (Chronicle?) in the library of All Souls’ College, Oxford, tells how John de Oghell 'received at Ogle castle David Dunbar a knight of a foxes tail’ and treated him first with the courtesy due to a stranger, but that after dinner they fell into a quarrel when he rising up slew his guest with a pole axe; another account says, Sir David Dunbar having travelled through several countries wearing a foxes tail in his cap as a challenge for anyone to fight and later coming through England on his way to his own country was fought and slain by Sir Robert Ogle with a pole axe which remained as a monument in the great hall of Bothal castle, which event gave rise to the following lines:

As the spray of the Ocean, breaks high on the rock
So rushed the fierce warriors, on to the shock
And the steeds which they rode, rnock’d the lightning in speed
When the thunderbolts level by heav’ns dark deed
On they came, and Sir Robert’s half moons glisted white,
Whilst, his mighty pole axe, as a meteor shone bright,
Presaging dark fate, like the Demon of War
That whispered the requiem to gallant Dunbar,
They met, and his fox crested helmet was crushed,
And low hurl’d the warrior down on the dust,
Whilst Ogles brave chieftin sped safe from the field,
Elate with the trophies he bore on his shield.

The history of the period, besides the barons’ war, comprised the settlement of John Balliol’s claim to the throne of Scotland in 1291, who two years later, renouncing his allegiance, led to war during which Hexharn abbey was pillaged and partially destroyed; in 1296, Edward I summoned Balliol to do homage, and, on his refusal, Berwick was stormed and taken, Corbridge was burnt by Wallace, and Harbottle castle besieged by the Scots. In 1297, Wallace having taken Berwick had to relinquish it, and in 1305 he was captured and executed. In 1306, Robert Bruce became king of Scotland.

He married Annabella, daughter of Sir Walter Selby (see x), as Annabella, widow of Sir John de Oggel, knight; she quit-claimed to Robert her son the manor of Oghill. reserving the chapel of the manor with a garden, etc.⁹³, and released all right she had as a dower; these transactions are

⁸¹Ap. 27. ⁸²Hodgson II ii, p. 48. ⁸³Hodgson II, ii., p. 303; Arch. AeL II, p. 10; Cal. Pat. year 1305; Surt. Soc. Vols. 66 & 88. ⁸⁴Hist. MSS., VI. ⁸⁵Ap. 28. ⁸⁶Hodgson II, ii., p. 326. ⁸⁷Ap. 31. ⁸⁸Ap. 35. ⁸⁹Ap. 32. ⁹⁰Ap. 42. ⁹¹Ap. 34. ⁹²Eg. D. ⁹³Ap. 40. x Glover.

Page 32

witnessed by Sir John de Fenwick who was sheriff 13 to 15 Edward II [1320-1322].⁹⁴   ([jump]To VII [below]).

M - Gilbert de Oggill, or Ogle, occurs by name in the assize roll of 7 Edward I ⁹⁵ [1279], and in 1313 one of the same name, Robert Bertram of Bothal, and others, received pardon as adherents of the earl of Lancaster and for the death of Gaveston⁹⁶; he seems also to have been on an inquisition, 24th of June, 8 Edward III [1335], where mention is made of Sir Robert Bertram of Bothal⁹⁷.

William de Oggill, or Ogle, was bailiff of Newcastle in the years 1283, 1289, 1292, 1294 to 1303, 1305, and 1306.⁹⁸ In 1292 he was a witness to a deed of benefaction to St. Mary’s Hospital;⁹⁹ and a witness and bailiff of eweastle in 1300.¹⁰⁰ Later he occurs as having given a messuage in Newcastle-upon-Tyne to Gilbert Oggill.¹⁰¹ ([jump]To VII M.)

John Oggill, or Ogle, occurs in a list of gentlemen who should have been knights 22nd of September, 1278; he held land under William de Ros and Roger de Coygners.¹⁰²

VII - Sir Robert Oggle, or Ogle, baron of Ogle, etc., son and heir of Sir John Ogle who in 1295 gave him a carucate of land in Oggill.¹⁰³. Hodgson says he was a ward of John de Denum, but the latter was probably only a trustee for in the year 1302 he won a case in the king’s court against John de Denum and his father John de Oggle, concerning land in Oggle,¹⁰⁴ and his father later in 1305 gave him land called Northstrother in Oggehill to which deed Sir Hugh Gubium and Roger Gubium were witnesses, so the gift was probably given on his marriage.^105. In 1313 his father augments his gifts of land.^106. On the 24th of August, 1318, Letters Patent by Sir William Ridel, sheriff, acknowledged the receipt by the hands of Robert de Ogle, 20 quarters of wheat and a cask of wine to store in Mitford castle.^107. This store was no doubt to guard against the attacks of King Robert Bruce, who in 1311/14, ravaged Tynedale and Redesdale and the injuries done in the counties of Northumberland and Durham were very great.   In 1314, Edward II assembled an army at Berwick previous to his defeat at Bannock burn. In 1318, Bruce captured Berwick, the Scots beseiged Norham in vain, and afterwards Mitford castle was taken and destroyed in 1323. In 1319, Edward II failed to take Berwick, and Norham was taken by the Scots and retaken by the English. In the same year Edward II thanked Sir Thomas Grey, constable of Norham, for the letters sent by Robert de Oggel, the present bearer, whom he also thanked for his good services.^108. Shortly before his mother had released to him the manor of Oghill and all rights by which she held dower.^109.   In 1323 he is returned in a list of men of arms in the county; these men at arms were the same as knights but had not taken the degree of knighthood upon them,¹¹⁰ and as such he was summond to the Council at Westminster.^111.He was also a witness in 1323 at Ainwick of a grant by Gilbert de Aton, kinsman of Wm. de Vesey, to Sir Henry Percy.¹¹². He was with Edward III at Stanhope Park in Durham when the king was unable to bring the Scots to battle,^113, and on their return over the Border they took Norham. A peace was concluded in 1328, when Princess Joanna, sister to Edward III, was married to Prince David. In 1329, Robert Bruce died, the peace was broken, and Berwick was beseiged by sea and land by Edward III, and the tragedy of the two sons of Sir Alexander Seton, the deputy governor, is said to have taken place.   On the 9th of September, 1329, Robert Oggle

⁹⁴Ap. 41.   ⁹⁵Surt. Soc. 88. ⁹⁶Parl. Writ. Westr., 16 Oct. 1313.   ⁹⁷Arch. Ael. IV., p. 45.   ⁹⁸Brand I. p. 71.   ⁹⁹Ib., 31.
¹⁰⁰Ap. 251 and see Hist. MSS., XIII.   ¹⁰¹Ap. 249.   ¹⁰²Hodgson I., pp. 295-6.   ¹⁰³Ap. 28.   ¹⁰⁴Ap. 29.   ¹⁰⁵Ap. 31. ¹⁰⁶Ap. 42.
¹⁰⁷Cal. Scot.   ¹⁰⁸Cal. Scot.   ¹⁰⁹Ap. 40, 41.   ¹¹⁰Hodgson I., p. 303.   ¹¹¹Parl. Writs.   ¹¹²Dodsworth MS., 74 f., 143.
¹¹³Wallis II., p. 551.

Page 33

occurs as a juror on an inquisition at Newcastle¹¹⁴. On the 28th of March, 1330 he received a pardon from the Crown¹¹⁵.   On the 10th of October, 1331, there is an enquiry into a complaint of Gilbert de Umfreville, earl of Angus, that Robert Ogle, William de Felton, and others broke into his park at Birtle and took the deer¹¹⁶. In 1333 Sir Archibald Douglas attempting to relieve Berwick was met and defeated with great slaughter at Halidon Hill. Berwick was then surrendered to the English and Edward Balliol nominally appointed king of Scotland. In 1335 Robert Oggle and others had orders to array the militia at Newcastle to meet Edward III on his way to Scotland¹¹⁷, but on the 13th of May Thomas de Heton, he, and others were ordered to cancel the array of men in Newcastle itself, although they had had orders to array all men at arms, hobilers, archers, etc., in the county to be ready to go against the invading Scots, because the mayor of Newcastle had promised his men to serve upon the sea¹¹⁸.   On the 25th of November he was deputed to raise all men capable of bearing arms in the franchise of Hexham, to spare none, and such as were disobedient to his orders to arrest and imprison, he being high bailiff of the dominion of Tynedale¹²⁰.   He occurs as a witness to grants by Sir Philip de Somerville lord of Witton, Underwood, and of John Corbit lord of Stanton, in which later grant he is described as a knight and Sir Ralph de Eure, sheriff¹²¹.   In 1338, Christiana, widow of Hugh de Acton, calls him lord of Ogle and gives him lands in Whalton¹²².   In 1339, in a licence to Henry Percy mention is made of the moiety of Thrasterton being in the tenure of Robert Oggle.¹²³   In 1340, Edward III was at Berwick with 46,000 men, on which occasion a tournament was held which ended in a real contest, when two Scottish and one English knight were killed.   In 1341 Edward III proceeded to Wark castle to relieve the countess of Salisbury who was beseiged in it.   In the same year King David Bruce made three incursions into England, in the second of which he encamped at Hedden Law, 6 miles from Newcastle, on Sunday, the 26th of August, when five knights were captured by the strategy of Sir Robert Oggle.   It appears that he decoyed them into a morass, a full description of the transaction is given in the Chronicle of Scotland, with the names of the knights captured who were held for ransom¹²⁴.   On the 11th of May of the same year he had a grant of free warren in Oggle, Aldensheles, Rouley, Shilvington, Haselrig, Folbiry, Thrasterton, Hurtheworth, with permission to crenillate and strengthen his manse of Oggle in consideration of his service against the Scotch¹²⁵.   There is no doubt that, at this time he was equivalent to a feudal baron¹²⁶.   Shilvington came to him from the Gubiums who held it in chief, and although some of his lands were held under other lords, it was evidently considered a barony by a committee of the House of Lords and he was called lord of Ogle at the battle of Neville’s Cross; Hodgson Hinde, however, thought differently¹²⁷, but evidently had not seen his inquisitions post mortem¹²⁸; moreover a writ of Edward III was directed to Robert de Ogle and Robert Bertram concerning the conducting of John Douglas, prisoner, to the tower on the 8th of December, 1346, see below¹²⁹, his name standing before the baron of Bothal, the sheriff and governor of the castle of Newcastle.   The same year Thomas de Burneton quit-claimed to him all his rights in Seaton near Woodhorn, and the fishing in the Wansbeck¹³⁰.   On the 10th of May, 1344, he was a commissioner to array the militia of the county, and on the 10th of April, 1345, in a similar commission with Robert Bertram and Adomar de Atheles¹³¹, and in the same year the Scots having invaded Cumberland burnt Carlisle and Penrith, he, John de Kirkeby, bishop of Carlisle and Sir Thomas Lucy raised

¹¹⁴Cal. Scot.   ¹¹⁵Ap. 43.   ¹¹⁶Cal. Scot. ¹¹⁷Rot. Scot. I. p. 327.   ¹¹⁸Cal. Close Rolls.   ¹¹⁹Roll Scot. I., p. 389.   ¹²⁰Wallis II., p 551.
¹²¹Hodgson II, ii. p 118.   ¹²²Ap. 147.   ¹²³Cal. Pat.   ¹²⁴Hist. Scot. II., pp. 467-468.   Arch. Ael. XIV.   ¹²⁵Ap. 258.   ¹²⁶Ap. 147.  ¹²⁷Hodgson I.    ¹²⁸Ap. 174, 175, 180.   ¹²⁹Rymer V., p. 533.   ¹³⁰Ap. 148.    ¹³¹Roll Scot. I., pp. 649 and 660.

Page 34

forces to oppose them; a party of foragers under Sir Alexander Straghan, their chief commander, were fiercely attacked, entirely routed, Sir Alexander being run through the body with a spear and killed by Sir Robert Oggle., he himself being dangerously wounded; after this the Scots returned to their own country¹³².   On the 9th of May, 1346, at Aldenscheles, Robert Doggie, seneschal of Annandale, in the name of William de Bohun, earl of Northampton, agreed with Richard de Thirilewalle to keep Lochmaben castle for one year, and a letter from Henry le Clerk reports Lochmaben will soon be victualled if he gets money to pay for stores at Carlisle and urges attention to the affairs of Robert Doggille and others in the castle. He, as R. Doggle, occurs as a surety, on the 9th of May, 1346, the deed has 4 shields in wax including a shield couché a fesse between 3 crescents, crest on a helmet a plume of feathers ‘Sr Roberti [Oggle].'¹³³   In 1346, the Scotch, under David II, having burnt Corbridge, etc., invaded Durham and encamped near the town of that name. On the 17th of October, he was met by four bishops, the Lords Neville, and Percy, Sir Robert Ogle, Sir Robert Bertram, and others, with 10,000 men and completely defeated at Neville’s Cross.   David himself was taken prisoner by John de Coupland who took him for the time being to Ogle castle, and it seem Sir Robert Ogle captured John Douglas, brother to the earl of that name, in addition to the earl of Fife, Henry de Ramsey and Thomas Boyd¹³⁴.   Froissart says that on the morning of the battle the Lords Ogle and Deincourt commanded the strong and gallant party which formed the Guard of Queen Philippa¹³⁵.   On the 20th of October, Lionel, the king’s son, Guardian of the Realm, signified to him and eleven others ‘That after thanks to God for the many benefits bestowed on him, and the king’s subjects, in the deepest sense of gratitude, he acknowledges himself bound to him for his approved loyalty and valour, for the honour of his name, and defence of the kingdom of England against the Scotch his enemies, beseeching him to be vigilant in those parts, that no damage may happen by the iniquity of his said late adversaries.’   Furthermore, he signified to him on December 8th, 1346, ‘ That for avoiding the escape of prisoners taken in the battle of Durham and elsewhere in the North he had ordered them to he carried to the Tower of London¹³⁶.”   He therefore commands him to convey those prisoners in his custody so as to be there and delivered to the constable of the said Tower on Wednesday before the feast of the Epiphany¹³⁷.   On the 20th of December, both he and Sir Robert Bertram were summoned to meet the prelates and nobles of the Kingdom at Westminster to consult on matters relative to the state and defence of the nation and to an expedition into Scotland¹³⁸.   In 1346 and 1350, he appears as steward of Hexhamshire, in which latter year he appears to have died, for his son in 1351 and later appears to deal with and hold the estate¹³⁹; he died possibly from the plague which seems to have then raged at Hexham¹⁴⁰.   His son in 1352, gave Thomas his son some land¹⁴¹.

He married, probably, in 1305,¹⁴² Margaret, daughter and heir of Sir Hugh Gubium, high sheriff in 1294, who had married Joan, daughter and sole heir of Nigell Morell and had two sons killed by the Scots, thus dying without issue male¹⁴³.   Sir Hugh was lord of Shilvington¹⁴⁴, and the name occurs in the roll of Battle abbey.   The name Morell occurs in 1093 as of Bamburgh, the earl’s deputy, who killed Malcolm, king of Scots, and in 1095, as sheriff of Bamburgh and kinsman to Robert Mowbray, earl of Northumberland, when he was besieged by William Rufus; Morell for his gallant defence of Bamburgh, was received into the king’s court and favour¹⁴⁵, but another account says he died in exile¹⁴⁶.   It is probably through this match

¹³²Ridp., p. .336.   ¹³³Cal. Scot.   ¹³⁴Rymer V., 533.   ¹³⁵Ridp., p. 336.   ¹³⁶Rymer V., pp. 528, 533.   ¹³⁷Ib. p. 535.   ¹³⁸Ridp, p. 762.   ¹³⁹Ap. 52, 53, 54, 55.   ¹⁴⁰Hist. North. III., p. 65.   ¹⁴¹Ap. 57.    ¹⁴²Ap. 31.    ¹⁴³Harl. MS., 1554.    ¹⁴⁴Hodgson III, I, p. 208.   ¹⁴⁵Cox, p. 631.    ¹⁴⁶Hodgson I., p. 195.

Home Start Previous Next Top