|
Home Return Page 1 - Page 2 - Page 3 - Page 4 - Page 5 - Page 6 |
|
European Roots: Human ancestors go back in time in Spanish cave
Bruce Bower Fossil finds in Spain have yielded the earliest known skeletal evidence of human ancestors in Europe, according to a new report. A fossil jaw and tooth from the same individual, found during excavations of a cave called Sima del Elefante in northern Spain's Atapuerca Mountains, date to between 1.2 million and 1.1 million years old, say anthropologist Eudald Carbonell of Universitat Rovira i Virgili in Tarragona, Spain, and his colleagues.
The investigators assign the new discoveries to the species Homo antecessor. A decade ago, they identified 800,000-year-old fossils from another Atapuerca site as H. antecessor. In the Spanish scientists' view, H. antecessor was an evolutionary precursor of European Neandertals and modern humans. Many scientists remain skeptical of that proposal and classify the Spanish fossils as the oldest examples of Homo heidelbergensis, a roughly 600,000-year-old species first found in Germany a century ago. However this debate plays out, the Sima del Elefante fossils "provide the oldest direct evidence, to our knowledge, for a human presence in Europe," Carbonell says. Anthropologist Bernard Wood of George Washington University in Washington, D.C., agrees that the find provides the first solid evidence that human ancestors reached Europe more than 1 million years ago. "Before this report, the evidence for an early occupation of Europe had substantial and important caveats," he says. The newly unearthed specimens were found in sediment that also contained stone tools, stone flakes produced during toolmaking, and numerous animal bones bearing butchery marks. Carbonell's team describes its work at Sima del Elefante in the March 27 Nature. Several lines of evidence provided an age estimate for the Spanish fossils. Reversals in Earth's magnetic field recorded in fossil-bearing sediments bracketed the fossils' age at between 1.78 million and 780,000 years old. The decay rate of certain radioactive isotopes in rock buried near the fossils—along with analyses of the types of now-extinct animals strewn among the finds—narrowed the age estimate down to 1.2 million to 1.1 million years old. The new finds strengthen earlier, contested evidence from other European sites—mainly consisting of stone implements, not fossils—that suggests human ancestors occupied the region at least 1 million years ago, Carbonell says. A broad anthropological consensus holds that large groups of human ancestors lived in Western Europe by 500,000 years ago. The Atapuerca investigators suggest that Western Europe was settled between 2 million and 1 million years ago by a Homo species that trekked out of Africa, perhaps into central Asia, and then moved westward. That species then evolved into H. antecessor, in their view. One possible ancestor of the ancient Atapuerca population has been found at the Dmanisi site in the central Asian nation of Georgia. Excavations there have yielded 1.77-million-year-old remains that may come from an early, highly mobile form of Homo erectus (SN: 9/22/07, p. 179). The Sima del Elefante fossils show no obvious anatomical links to the Dmanisi remains, Wood says. Still, an evolutionary connection between Dmanisi and Atapuerca is plausible, he says. It's unknown whether enough human ancestors entered Western Europe before 1 million years ago to establish a permanent presence in the region so that they could evolve into later European Homo species, Wood notes. |
Early human bipedalism confirmed
One such fossil, a 6-million-year-old thigh bone from a species called Orrorin tugenensis, is the topic of a new study published in Science yesterday. Despite previous examinations of this fossil, which was discovered in Kenya in 2000, researchers still debate whether O. tugenensis walked upright and whether it was more closely related to the australopithecines that lived 3 million to 2 million years ago or to the much later Homo. Brian G. Richmond of George Washington University in Washington, D.C., and William L. Jungers of Stony Brook University in New York write in Science that they have resolved the debate by determining that O. tugenensis did indeed walk upright and that its hip structure is more similar to the australopithecines. Richmond and Jungers based their conclusions about the species' bipedalism and hip mechanism on the shape of the thigh bone. Using calipers, they recorded many of the fossil's dimensions, and then compared their measurements through statistical analyses to various hominin and ape species. Determining that O. tugenensis was bipedal is significant, Richmond says, because it reduces the time window during which the hominin lineage could have originated to between about 6.5 million to 7 million years ago. The presence of not only bipedal but also more primitive tree-climbing traits in the species indicates that O. tugenensis is not far removed from the ape-human common ancestor but that it is "already in the human line," Richmond says. Robert Barry Eckhardt, an evolutionary biologist at Penn State University in University Park, says the study's findings that O. tugenensis was bipedal is not new: "[It] is just the same conclusion that my colleagues concluded on the basis of the very same evidence in 2001." Eckhardt says that the paper's hypothesis that O. tugenensis is more similar to Australopithecus afarensis than to modern Homo "may or may not be true," although he says the statistical data presented within the paper do not suggest that this is a strong possibility. Andrew T. Chamberlain, a biological anthropologist at the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom, says that the study has quantitatively and convincingly established bipedalism in the specimen. The findings are significant, he says. Chamberlain agrees with the researchers that O. tugenensis shared a hip and gait mechanism with the much younger A. afarensis — such as the famed Lucy. As the femur "morphology is an early example of australopithecine," he says, it demonstrates that the hip mechanism was evolutionarily stable. He adds that more studies of A. afarensis might confirm this. |
|
Neandertal Gene Study Reveals Early Split With Humans
Elizabeth Svoboda for National Geographic News October 26, 2006 A new genetic study bolsters theories of an early human-Neandertal split and is helping scientists pinpoint what makes humans unique. Controversy has long swirled in the scientific community over how closely the Eurasian hunters resembled modern humans, with some researchers even claiming Neandertals (often spelled Neanderthals) were actually members of our own species, Homo sapiens. (Related: "Neandertals' Last Stand Was in Gibraltar, Study Suggests" [September 13, 2006].) A new study by geneticist James Noonan at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, however, reveals that modern humans and Neandertals' most recent common ancestor probably perished about 400,000 years ago. The research was presented earlier this month at the American Society of Human Genetics conference in New Orleans, Louisiana (get a genetics overview). Richard Potts, director of the human origins program at the National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C., called Noonan's work "highly significant." "Each part of the Neandertal genome is an archive of the similarity and distinction [between Neandertals and] all people living today," he said. "Comparison to a lineage in our own family tree helps us understand which elements of the genetic code make us human." Going Nuclear To obtain the raw material for his study, Noonan extracted DNA from fossilized Neandertal bones. Combing the samples for Neandertal-specific genetic sequences was a painstaking process bogged down by large amounts of contamination. "Most of the DNA we got was bacterial DNA from organisms that had colonized the specimens," Noonan said. "We can pick out the ancient DNA sequences because they're shorter and more degraded." After analyzing the genetic content of the sequences, Noonan and his colleagues began cataloging them in a library similar to that used to help organize the human genome. Initial results indicate Neandertals have contributed surprisingly little to modern humans' genetic makeup. Noonan's work represents a significant advance over earlier studies of Neandertal genetics, such as those conducted by William Goodwin of the University of Glasgow in Scotland. (Related: "Neandertals Not Our Ancestors, DNA Study Suggests" [May 14, 2003].) That early work involved analysis of mitochondrial DNA, which tends to stay preserved longer than DNA found inside the nuclei of cells. But Noonan analyzed nuclear DNA, which holds a much greater wealth of information. "Nuclear DNA is where all the biology is," Noonan said. "We want to understand how traits like language and cognition are encoded, and none of those traits can be found in mitochondrial DNA." Race to the Finish Like the multiple groups who worked simultaneously to sequence the human genome, Noonan faces competition from other inspired teams. Genetic anthropologist Svante Paabo of the Max Planck Institute in Leipzig, Germany, is working on a similar sequencing project using DNA from bone specimens belonging to a Neandertal who lived in Croatia about 45,000 years ago. "A Neandertal genome sequence will provide a catalog of all changes that happened in the human genome after humans separated from Neandertals, so it will be a wonderful tool for scientists who want to find out what makes modern humans unique," Paabo said. While Noonan's focus is on studying the sequences of Neandertal DNA he considers most significant—those he can compare to modern human DNA sequences—Paabo's goal is to sequence the entire Neandertal genome within two years. Based on his results to date, Paabo expects to see some surprises as his project proceeds. "Neandertal DNA is degraded in specific ways that we had not anticipated, and in some ways Neandertals actually look closer to humans than we had expected," he said. The Natural History Museum's Potts hopes Noonan's and Paabo's investigations, in addition to fleshing out Neandertals' genetic profile, will lend insight into their day-to-day existence, including the challenges they faced that shaped specific genetic adaptations. "The genetic analysis of Neandertals complements the study of fossils and the archaeological record of Neandertal behavior," he said. "All this evidence allows us to understand exactly how Neandertals lived and adapted to a changing world that eventually included our species." |
|
9,000-Year-Old Drilled Teeth Are Work of Stone Age Dentists The
discovery of drilled teeth in a graveyard in Pakistan shows that
proto-dentists used hand-powered, flint-tipped drills 9,000 years
ago. 20,000-Year-Old Human Footprints Found in Australia Stacked like well-trod carpets, layers of mud from an ancient wetland have preserved the world's largest collection of ancient human fossil footprints. Americas Settled by Two Groups of Early Humans, Study Says At least two distinct groups of early humans colonized the Americas, a new study says, reviving the debate about who the first Americans were and when they arrived. |